We have all heard the saying "the  proof of the pudding is in the eating". Well, it may also ring true when it comes to research.

 

I'm sure there are a wealth of intricate measurements to determine the value of research, but let's talk about two: benchmarking and usefulness.

 

Firstly I believe that the long term “proof of the pudding” can be determined by evaluating a lifetime of research. Take for instance Prof Melville Saayman and Prof Alta Schutte, who were recently recognised as outstanding scientists by the National Science and Technology Forum when they received what are known as the “Science Oscars”.

 

Secondly, research should be useful – someone or something should benefit from it, either directly or indirectly.

 

As Alta commented on winning her award: “In the end, all that matters is that our contributions to science make a difference.”

 

It may be that the research results improve the lives or existence of people, animals or the planet. It may also be that the results add to the worldwide knowledge economy, forming the basis for future useful research.

 

After all, it’s through the research of great scientists such as these two that ordinary people should benefit – such as by obtaining new knowledge and insight. In this vein, Melville and another researcher, Prof Henri Bezuidenhout, share their expertise with us in two special Eish! articles. One is about the influence of terrorism on tourism, and the other about cross-cultural awareness and understanding.

 

I think a big thanks to all our NWU researchers is in order. Thanks for improving lives and enriching ordinary people’s understanding of the wonderful world around us. The proof of the pudding is indeed in the eating.

 

Happy reading!